A regional clinic deploys a WAN Edge with a connected LAN in VPN 10, a static route to a printer subnet, and OSPF-learned clinical subnets in VPN 10. OMP must share the LAN and printer routes to remotes but withhold OSPF routes until migration completes. Which OMP redistribution control achieves this selective advertisement?

The selective requirement is met by independent per-protocol redistribution into OMP on the Edge, so enabling connected covers the directly attached LAN in VPN 10 and enabling static covers the printer subnet while keeping the OSPF-to-OMP switch off withholds the clinical subnets until migration, preserving isolation without extra policy. Temporarily redistributing OSPF with a higher metric still fails because metric tuning only influences best-path selection and does not prevent advertisement, so withheld prefixes would still propagate to remotes and violate the migration hold. Holding static redistribution disabled pending validation also fails because the printer subnet exists only as a static route, so without static-to-OMP advertisement remotes never learn that prefix despite correct LAN and OSPF handling. Suppressing connected advertisement to reduce update volume similarly fails because the LAN is known only as a connected prefix, so disabling that source removes required reachability even though static and OSPF handling may be otherwise correct. The exam caveat is that OMP redistribution defaults and metric or summarization knobs do not equal filtering, so read whether the stem asks to withhold, prefer, or aggregate. The practical check is to compare the local VPN 10 routing table with advertised OMP routes on the Edge and received OMP routes on a remote and the controller, confirming presence of connected and static prefixes and absence of OSPF prefixes.