An English-language blog hosted outside the EU is merely accessible to occasional EU readers and shows no EU language versions, EU currency, EU shipping, or EU-focused ads. Counsel claims accessibility alone equals GDPR targeting. Which analysis is sound?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A postcard on a global corkboard that anyone might glance at is not the same as mailing German flyers with euro prices. GDPR targeting looks for real outreach cues, not mere reachability. Occasional EU eyeballs alone do not finish the analysis.
Full Explanation
Recital 23 and related guidance emphasise that the mere accessibility of a website in the Union is insufficient to conclude that a controller envisages offering goods or services to data subjects there. Targeting factors include language, currency, shipping, and EU-directed marketing. Accessibility does not automatically prove monitoring either. Blogs are not categorically outside scope if other Article 3 triggers are met.