A US online retailer has no office or staff in the EU, but it runs German-language ads, shows prices in euros, and ships to German addresses. How should territorial scope under the GDPR be analysed?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Picture a shop that never rents space in Berlin but still puts up German signs, euro price tags, and local delivery. Under the GDPR, that kind of deliberate outreach can pull a non-EU seller into scope even without an EU office. Location of the HQ alone does not write the whole story.
Full Explanation
Article 3(2)(a) extends the GDPR to controllers or processors not established in the Union when they offer goods or services to data subjects in the Union. Language, currency, and shipping to Member States are classic targeting indicators. Absence of an EU office does not create a free pass. Server location alone is not the territorial-scope test.