A service aimed at children presents its privacy information only in dense adult legalese. What GDPR transparency expectation is most clearly missed?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
If kids are the audience, write for kids. Adult contract-speak fails the "intelligible" test. Plain, age-appropriate language is part of doing transparency right for children's services.
Full Explanation
Article 12 requires information in clear and plain language, and Recital 58 emphasises that where processing is addressed to a child, information should be in such clear and plain language that the child can easily understand. Dense adult legalese undermines that expectation. Official Journal-only notices, vital-interests-only myths, and arbitrary minimum word counts are not the rule.