An election office SD-Access fabric must hand off traffic to a traditional WAN edge that is not fabric-aware. Which border design provides IP connectivity without requiring the WAN edge to understand fabric overlays?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Non-fabric gear is like a county road that never learned the fabric’s private street names. IP transit at the border translates fabric destinations into ordinary IP routes the WAN edge already understands. You do not bolt LISP or VXLAN onto that traditional box just to get packets out.
Full Explanation
Cisco SD-Access borders can hand off to external networks using IP transit, where the border de-encapsulates overlay traffic and exchanges native IP reachability with non-fabric peers. That pattern fits election-office sites that must keep a traditional WAN edge outside the fabric. Extending LISP/VXLAN state onto equipment that is not fabric-aware is unsupported and fragile. IP transit preserves segmentation intent at the border while presenting a conventional routed attachment to the WAN.