An emergency-management office operates two city SD-Access fabrics and wants site-to-site fabric connectivity without hair-pinning all inter-site traffic through the data center. Which transit approach targets that goal?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Two city fabrics should shake hands without driving every packet downtown first. SD-Access with SD-WAN transit (or SDA transit patterns) stitches sites so traffic can take a planned path instead of a mandatory DC hairpin. That keeps emergency apps responsive when sites talk to each other.
Full Explanation
Multi-site SD-Access designs use transit options—including SD-Access transit and SD-WAN transit—to interconnect fabric sites and carry overlay traffic between them. Choosing an appropriate transit avoids inefficient hair-pinning of all inter-site flows through a single DC chokepoint when policy allows more direct paths. VLAN stretch or guest-anchor tricks are not substitutes for proper fabric transit architecture.