A county records office has continuous intake of digitization requests with no versioned release train, while a separate team ships a citizen app on a cadence of planned releases. Which methodology-component fit is most appropriate?

Methodology fit follows work characteristics. Continuous, interrupt-driven intake often aligns with Kanban flow components, while versioned product increments often align with Scrum timeboxed events and artifacts. CAPM asks associates to distinguish those component styles and choose an appropriate fit. Forcing one framework onto every municipal workflow, or defaulting solely to predictive critical-path control, misses that distinction.