An administrator is troubleshooting a pilot deployment and wants the most appropriate next step. What is the best way to handle use case inventory while staying aligned with the certification objectives?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Imagine running a restaurant kitchen with no order tickets — cooks guessing, dishes colliding, customers waiting forever. That is what ungoverned AI looks like, and option A is the kitchen display system that fixes it: configured inventories and workflows keep every use case registered, assessed, and visible. The wrong options try to wing it with spreadsheets or single buckets, which collapse under real-world load. Option A is your system — memorize it!
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
The correct answer is A. Configure inventories and workflows so AI use cases can be registered, assessed, and governed. aligns directly with the 3.0 Configure watsonx.governance exam objective and reflects how IBM watsonx.governance operationalizes this practice in enterprise environments. IBM watsonx.governance is designed to provide the tooling, workflows, and evidence collection mechanisms that make AI trustworthy and auditable from intake through retirement. Choosing this option ensures the implementation is both defensible to regulators and maintainable by governance teams across the full AI lifecycle. Option B is incorrect because it relies on an informal, non-auditable mechanism that cannot support enterprise governance at scale. Option C is incorrect because it narrows the scope to a single artifact or metric and misses the full governance requirement. Option D is incorrect because it applies an overbroad rule that eliminates meaningful differentiation and accountability. On scenario-based exam questions, the correct answer is consistently the one that operationalizes the IBM governance practice with structured controls rather than approximating it with shortcuts, manual workarounds, or oversimplified rules.