A municipal fish-hatchery summary shares many words with the brochure but invents a fish count. The overlap score looks fine; a faithfulness check fails. What should the team conclude?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Think of a hatchery summary that steals brochure words and still invents a fish count. Overlap can look fine while faithfulness fails. Shared words are not proof the facts were grounded.
Full Explanation
Overlap is not the same as factual grounding. A summary can share brochure words and still invent a count. Treating overlap as proof of faithfulness, or accepting invented counts, fails that check.