911 is in a CJIS-style audit. A technician offers last quarter's lab screenshots as encryption, sensor, and firewall evidence. What should the administrator submit instead?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Lab photos of a practice dispatch desk do not prove the live 911 floor is locked. Pull production UEM, Carbon Black Cloud, and NSX-T reports from the managed estate.
Full Explanation
When 911 is in a CJIS-style audit and a technician offers last quarter's lab screenshots as encryption, sensor, and firewall evidence, the administrator should submit production Workspace ONE UEM, Carbon Black Cloud, and NSX-T reports from the managed 911 estate instead. Treat production reports as the live dispatch-floor evidence pack; lab classroom pictures are not the managed estate. Lab screenshots plus a glossary of managerial control families fail by concept because lab images and control glossaries are not production telemetry. Horizon golden-image notes from a classroom cluster fail because classroom image notes do not prove encryption, sensor prevention, or firewall posture on the live 911 estate. Vendor marketing decks for vDefend on VCF 9 fail because successor-product marketing is not 2V0-81.20 regulation evidence for the managed environment. Exam caveat: assurance data must come from the production managed estate's UEM, Carbon Black Cloud, and NSX-T reports. Operational check: export current production UEM encryption and compliance, CBC prevention policy, and NSX-T firewall reports for 911, exclude lab artifacts, and submit only production-dated evidence to the CJIS-style auditors.