PROC LIFEREG is used to fit a Weibull accelerated failure time (AFT) model. How does PROC LIFEREG differ from PROC PHREG in its modeling approach?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Here's the deal — b is correct because PROC LIFEREG fits parametric AFT models where the log of survival time is a linear function of predictors under an assumed distributional family (Weibull, exponential, log-normal, etc.). PROC PHREG fits the Cox proportional hazards model, which is semi-parametric: covariates enter multiplicatively on the hazard, and the baseline hazard is left unspecified.
Full Explanation
B is correct because PROC LIFEREG fits parametric AFT models where the log of survival time is a linear function of predictors under an assumed distributional family (Weibull, exponential, log-normal, etc.). PROC PHREG fits the Cox proportional hazards model, which is semi-parametric: covariates enter multiplicatively on the hazard, and the baseline hazard is left unspecified. A reverses the descriptions. C is wrong; both procedures handle right-censoring. D is wrong; PROC LIFETEST computes Kaplan-Meier curves.