PROC LIFEREG is used to fit a Weibull accelerated failure time (AFT) model. How does PROC LIFEREG differ from PROC PHREG in its modeling approach?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Here's the deal — b is correct because PROC LIFEREG fits parametric AFT models where the log of survival time is a linear function of predictors under an assumed distributional family (Weibull, exponential, log-normal, etc.). PROC PHREG fits the Cox proportional hazards model, which is semi-parametric: covariates enter multiplicatively on the hazard, and the baseline hazard is left unspecified.
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
B is correct because PROC LIFEREG fits parametric AFT models where the log of survival time is a linear function of predictors under an assumed distributional family (Weibull, exponential, log-normal, etc.). PROC PHREG fits the Cox proportional hazards model, which is semi-parametric: covariates enter multiplicatively on the hazard, and the baseline hazard is left unspecified. A reverses the descriptions. C is wrong; both procedures handle right-censoring. D is wrong; PROC LIFETEST computes Kaplan-Meier curves.