A courts system must encrypt case files at rest so cryptographic key control remains with the justice AWS account rather than depending only on default keys owned by a shared security account. Which encryption strategy best meets this ownership requirement?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
If justice must hold the keys to the evidence room, mint customer managed KMS keys in the justice account and point S3 or disks at those keys. Borrowing only someone else's defaults—or skipping encryption—does not meet ownership requirements.
Full Explanation
Customer managed AWS KMS keys allow an account to own key policies, rotation, and grants. Placing CMKs in the justice account and authorizing court workloads (and any required cross-account roles) via key policies meets data-at-rest ownership goals for case files. AWS owned keys provide less customer control, leaving data unencrypted is unacceptable for case files, and sharing root credentials is an anti-pattern.