Planning commissioners ask the building-permits Product Owner to hide politically sensitive items from the Product Backlog so inspection stays “quiet.” What should the Product Owner do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A backlog you cannot see is like a permit board with half the applications in a desk drawer—nobody can inspect the real work. Transparency is how empiricism even starts. Politics that prefer opacity are asking the Product Owner to turn the lights off.
Full Explanation
Transparency of the Product Backlog is a prerequisite for inspection and adaptation. Hiding politically sensitive permit work in a shadow list, deleting it, or encrypting it for a closed session all make the product state opaque. The Product Owner remains accountable for Product Backlog content and order and should keep that artifact inspectable by the Scrum Team and stakeholders. Quiet politics do not override the empiricism the Scrum framework depends on.