The city's open-data robots.txt disallows /drafts, but that path still loads in a browser if the URL is known. What is the correct OSINT reading?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
robots.txt is a "please don't index this" sign, not a deadbolt. The file is a public clue about intended privacy, and a loadable /drafts URL is not a green light to republish civic drafts. Note the path, then get records advice before anyone copies it out.
Full Explanation
robots.txt is a public artifact that reveals paths the publisher asked crawlers not to index, not an access-control mechanism, so a known URL may still load. PORP-scope website OSINT records that clue without treating hidden civic drafts as fair game to republish. Mass enumeration and dumping disallowed paths is not the method. Records or legal advice governs whether draft civic data should leave the collection notes.