A draft municipal report states 'WPA2 is broken' after offline recovery of a weak guest passphrase. How should the finding be reframed?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
You beat a sticky-note password, not the AES engine under the hood. Say the passphrase was weak and recoverable. Do not write the headline as if WPA2's cipher suite collapsed.
Full Explanation
Accurate reporting distinguishes implementation and password-choice failures from breaks in the underlying cipher. Recovering a weak WPA2-PSK via dictionary methods demonstrates poor secret selection and operational risk, not that AES-CCMP was cryptanalyzed or that 802.11 as a whole failed. Monitor mode is an assessment capability, not proof of a cipher flaw, and dictionaries remain relevant against guessable PSKs.