An address-line matcher was parked on a GPU instance “in case vision is added later.” GPU utilization is near zero and the bill is not. Recommendation jobs already show a CPU family is enough. What should they do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
An address-line matcher sits on a GPU in case vision is added later, and GPU utilization is near zero. Rightsize onto a CPU family that matches measured use. Holding an idle GPU is not rightsizing, and adding another GPU treats low use as under-capacity.
Full Explanation
Measured GPU utilization near zero is a cost problem: move the matcher onto a CPU family that matches the workload. Holding an idle GPU “in case” is not rightsizing. Comprehend is not that action, and adding another GPU treats low utilization as under-capacity.