Irrigation-district staff have a working scikit-learn pipeline and want it trained as a managed SageMaker job, not rewritten in XGBoost and not handed a blank CUDA kernel. Which path fits?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Staff already have a working scikit-learn pipeline. Point SageMaker's sklearn estimator at it and leave the code alone. Forcing XGBoost or a blank CUDA kernel rewrites working code, and Translate is not that trainer.
Full Explanation
SageMaker supports scikit-learn as a common ML library through its estimator and container. That is the service-choice path for an existing sklearn pipeline. Forcing XGBoost or a blank CUDA kernel rewrites working code. Translate is not that estimator.