An organization requires that AI-generated content used in regulatory filings must be immutably preserved as a record. A compliance engineer needs to configure Microsoft Purview so that these documents cannot be modified or deleted during the retention period. Which Microsoft Purview feature should be used?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
You need Records Management with regulatory records lock (WORM protection) because it makes AI-generated regulatory filings immutable during retention. A plain retention policy, an eDiscovery hold, or a Do Not Forward label does not give that same record lock.
Full Explanation
The correct choice is Records Management with regulatory records lock (WORM protection) because Microsoft Purview Records Management supports declaring content as regulatory records with WORM (Write Once, Read Many) protection, which makes the content immutable: it cannot be modified, relabeled, or deleted even by global administrators during the retention period. The retention policy with 'Delete content after retention period' action is incorrect because a simple retention policy prevents deletion during the retention period but does not apply immutable record locking. The eDiscovery In-Place Hold applied to the SharePoint site storing AI-generated content is incorrect because eDiscovery In-Place Holds can be released by eDiscovery managers and are not as restrictive as regulatory records. The Information Protection sensitivity label with 'Do Not Forward' protection applied is incorrect because sensitivity labels with 'Do Not Forward' control information rights for communication, not document immutability.