Before production, security wants proactive adversarial testing of the multi-agent system for prompt injection, tool abuse, and jailbreaks. You are implementing shift-left security in Microsoft Foundry. Which approach best aligns?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
C matches shift-left with Foundry’s AI Red Teaming Agent pattern. You want automated adversarial probes for injection, tool misuse, and policy bypass in CI/pre-prod, then fix before customers see issues. Waiting for breaches is reckless. Port scans miss LLM attack surfaces. Demo scripts are not red teams. Bake AI red teaming into the SDLC for multi-agent releases.
Full Explanation
Correct Answer — C
Shift-left security for multi-agent solutions includes using the AI Red Teaming Agent in Foundry. Integrating adversarial evaluations into pre-production catches prompt injection, tool abuse, and jailbreak paths before release.
Why A is wrong: Post-breach testing is the opposite of shift-left.
Why B is wrong: Network scans do not exercise LLM prompt and tool attack surfaces.
Why D is wrong: Friendly demos are not adversarial assurance.
Exam tip: AI Red Teaming Agent in pre-prod pipelines = shift-left for agents.