A multi-agent compliance workflow flags ambiguous policy cases. Business requires humans to approve, override, or escalate before external communications are sent. How should you design the workflow controls?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Correct answer: D. Ambiguous compliance needs HITL: approve, override, escalate—with outbound side effects blocked until a human decision is recorded and audited. Post-send summaries (A) are too late. Dropping humans at 70% quiz accuracy (B) is reckless. Self-override loops (C) defeat controls. Design UX for HAX so reviewers see tool context and agent rationale quickly.
Full Explanation
Workflow design includes human-in-the-loop processes—approval, overrides, edge cases—and HAX/responsible AI controls. Option D enforces blocking gates and auditability. Option A is detect-after-harm. Option B uses an inadequate threshold to remove oversight. Option C allows agents to bypass policy. Specify SLAs for human queues and fallback behavior when reviewers are unavailable (safe default: do not send).