A university's approved prompt rules require a refusal line when a question is outside the student handbook. A submitted study-skills prompt sets a role and an output shape, and it has no refusal line. What should prompt review do?

The university's approved prompt rules require a refusal when the question is outside the handbook. This study-skills prompt has a role and an output shape and no refusal line, so prompt review blocks it until that line is added. Approving the prompt now and adding a refusal line only after students complain about bad answers ships a prompt that will answer outside the handbook and waits for harm before it complies. Approving the prompt and pasting the handbook into it so a refusal line is treated as optional stuffs source text into the instruction and still leaves the required refusal out. Changing the prompt title so it contains the word refusal, and approving the body unchanged, puts the word on the label and leaves the body without the line the rule requires. A role and an output shape do not substitute for the refusal. Exam caveat: the refusal is for questions the handbook does not cover. It is not a reason to refuse questions the handbook does answer. Operational check: the review status stays blocked, and a later submission is approved only after the body contains the refusal line.