A lab mixes statically configured VXLAN tunnels with EVPN-driven dynamic VTEP discovery for the same civic VNI. What control-plane contrast should engineers keep clear?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Static tunnels are handwritten phone numbers for remote VTEPs; EVPN is the auto-updated contact list. Mixing them in a lab is fine for learning, but do not pretend they discover peers the same way. EVPN does not wait on STP roots, and neither design ignores VNI membership.
Full Explanation
Static VXLAN configurations explicitly define remote VTEP endpoints, which is simple at tiny scale but operationally brittle as membership changes. EVPN dynamically advertises Ethernet Segment / VNI membership and MAC/IP state so VTEPs discover relevant remote endpoints through BGP. The two models can coexist in labs, yet operators must understand which path builds the tunnel list. STP is unrelated to EVPN tunnel discovery, and both approaches still key on VNI segmentation.