A municipal IPv6-only management discussion asks whether DHCP-family concepts still matter for ZTP-like automated bring-up. Which framing is most accurate for this bank’s DC deployment focus?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Whatever the address family debate, automated bring-up still needs something that hands out addresses and points at files. For Juniper DC ZTP, the conversation is usually DHCPv4-centered—but the role of lease-plus-options does not vanish just because someone says IPv6-only. Do not invent exotic NAT64 mandates as the answer.
Full Explanation
Automated DC switch provisioning depends on mechanisms that deliver addressing and boot/file information. Official JNCIP-DC deployment topics emphasize DHCP in that role, and common ZTP patterns are DHCPv4-centric in practice. An IPv6-only brainstorm does not erase the need for controlled address/option delivery, nor does it justify inventing NAT64-as-mandatory for every leaf. Keep answers aligned to DHCP’s deployment function without unsupported protocol claims.