A municipal DR site wants ZTP servers local to that site so new gear can bring up if the primary DC path is down. Which placement idea best supports resilient site-local ZTP?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
If the primary city DC is dark, the DR site still needs its own provisioning kitchen—local DHCP and file servers. That way DR leaves can cook their day-0 configs without hauling recipes across a broken WAN. Site-local ZTP infrastructure is resilience, not luxury.
Full Explanation
Disaster-recovery bring-up should not depend solely on provisioning services that are only reachable through a failed primary path. Local DHCP and file-server placement at the DR site supports ZTP when interconnects are unavailable. USB courier processes may be a last resort but are not the resilient automated design. Unmanaged Internet provisioning is an unsafe substitute for site-local controlled services.