A Chief Risk Officer is building an AI risk committee structure. Which governance body composition BEST ensures comprehensive oversight of AI risk?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Here's the deal — you need a cross-functional committee with risk, legal/compliance, IT security, business owners, ethics, and executive sponsorship. That gives you technical, legal, cyber, business, and ethical oversight in one body. Data-science-only committees are too narrow.
Full Explanation
The cross-functional committee with risk management, legal/compliance, IT security, business owners, ethics representatives, and executive sponsorship is correct because comprehensive AI risk governance requires technical, legal/regulatory, cybersecurity, business impact, and ethical perspectives, and executive sponsorship ensures authority and accountability. The committee composed exclusively of data scientists is too narrow technically. The committee of external AI consultants lacks operational accountability. The existing IT risk committee with AI added as an agenda item without structural changes lacks the cross-functional depth required for AI risk.