During an AI system audit, the auditor discovers that model outputs are reviewed by humans before being acted upon, but the human reviewers are processing 800 cases per day — far exceeding what one person could meaningfully review. What audit finding does this represent?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
You've got a real audit finding here. When reviewers are pushed through 800 cases a day, the human check is just going through the motions, not meaningful oversight. That means the AI system is effectively running on its own.
Full Explanation
The finding is that human oversight is nominal rather than meaningful, creating a risk that the AI system is effectively operating autonomously. The volume of cases — 800 per day — far exceeds what a human can meaningfully review, so the oversight is performative rather than substantive. This is an audit finding that the human-review control is designed but not operating effectively, leaving the AI system functionally autonomous. The no-finding option ignores the distinction between nominal and meaningful oversight. The staffing option mislabels a governance finding as an HR matter. The cybersecurity option is unrelated.