During an AI system audit, the auditor discovers that model outputs are reviewed by humans before being acted upon, but the human reviewers are processing 800 cases per day — far exceeding what one person could meaningfully review. What audit finding does this represent?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Here's the deal — b is correct because the volume of cases — 800 per day — far exceeds what a human can meaningfully review, meaning the human oversight is performative rather than substantive. This creates an audit finding that the control of human review is designed but not operating effectively, leaving the AI system functionally autonomous.
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
B is correct because the volume of cases — 800 per day — far exceeds what a human can meaningfully review, meaning the human oversight is performative rather than substantive. This creates an audit finding that the control of human review is designed but not operating effectively, leaving the AI system functionally autonomous. A ignores the distinction between nominal and meaningful oversight. C mislabels a governance finding as an HR matter. D is unrelated.