During an incident, reviewers cannot find who is accountable for a misbehaving model. What does this most likely indicate about the original intake?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
If nobody can find the owner during an incident, the intake didn't capture one. You need an accountable party in the inventory entry, or there's nobody to contact.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is the option stating that owner information was never captured at registration, so the inventory entry has no accountable party to contact. When intake genuinely captures owner alongside purpose and business context, that owner remains discoverable regardless of staffing changes elsewhere, because the entry also names a role or team, not just an individual. The option blaming the incident response process is incorrect because incident response cannot surface accountability the inventory never recorded; the gap is upstream, at registration. The option saying the model was registered correctly but the assigned owner left the organisation is incorrect because a departure is a separate, solvable problem once an owner was recorded in the first place, and does not by itself explain a missing entry. The option saying the inventory intentionally omits ownership for models below a certain risk tier is incorrect because ownership should be captured for every registered use case, not filtered by risk tier. For the exam, connect a missing-owner incident directly back to an incomplete intake record.