What is wrong with treating every warning as a resolved incident?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Marking a warning resolved does not resolve it. It just makes the queue look tidy while the problem continues and wrecks the record of what was really fixed.
Full Explanation
Treating every warning as a resolved incident is wrong because resolution status is meant to reflect reality. Closing conditions that have not actually been addressed hides ongoing problems and destroys the record of what was genuinely fixed, leaving live conditions unattended and making history useless for spotting recurring problems. The claim that warnings cannot be marked resolved in Instana is incorrect because the issue is about practice rather than capability. The claim that resolved incidents are deleted immediately is incorrect because resolved events remain within the retention period. The claim that warnings automatically escalate to incidents if left open is incorrect because escalation depends on the condition, not on how long an entry stays open. For the exam, keep resolution status truthful so that history remains analysable.