Which statement best summarises the recommended approach to troubleshooting a failed transformation job?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Don't guess. Work through inputs, dependencies, unsupported constructs, and component status in order. That checklist finds the real cause before you act.
Full Explanation
The correct approach is to work through inputs, dependencies, unsupported constructs, and component status systematically to identify the actual cause before acting. Systematically checking these four areas is what actually locates the cause of a failed transformation, rather than guessing or reacting to the symptom alone.
Retrying the job until it succeeds is incorrect because blind retrying does not fix a persistent cause and only helps with the rare transient issue, which cannot be distinguished from a real problem without diagnosis.
Removing any COBOL section that triggers a failure so the rest of the transformation can proceed is incorrect because deleting a failing section discards code rather than resolving why it failed.
Treating every failure as a defect in the Java compiler unless proven otherwise is incorrect because assuming a compiler bug skips the more common and more likely causes in the source or environment.
For the exam, remember the four-part checklist as the standard troubleshooting approach.