Good practice for involving mainframe SMEs in a modernisation programme is under discussion in a design review, with several choices on the table. What is the answer?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Keep the SME in the room. Generated output is only a draft, so you need them to confirm it means what it should and covers the edge cases.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is keeping SMEs involved throughout, using them to confirm that generated output reflects true business meaning and covers edge cases. Ongoing SME involvement is what confirms generated artefacts match real business intent and handle the edge cases the legacy program was built to cover.
The option to remove SMEs from the programme once AI-generated output becomes available is incorrect because AI output being available does not remove the need to verify it, which is exactly the SME's role.
The option to treat AI-generated comments as signed-off requirements without further review is incorrect because generated comments are a draft that needs confirming, not a finalised requirement.
The option to limit validation of transformed logic to the Java development team alone is incorrect because Java developers alone can confirm technical correctness but not whether the result matches business intent.
For the exam, good practice keeps SMEs engaged for the duration, confirming meaning rather than being replaced by generated output.