Modular components are already being generated before any candidate selection or review took place — a gap the current plan review turns up. What should happen next?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Out-of-order steps do not fix themselves. You need to stop generation and go back to the analysis, selection, and review the workflow calls for before continuing.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is to stop generation, go back to analyzing the application, and properly select and review candidate components before continuing. The workflow's order exists because each step depends on the last; the fix for skipping analysis and review is to return to them, not to keep moving forward and hope the components turn out right anyway. Continuing generation as planned is incorrect because review after generation is far more costly, since it means reworking code rather than correcting a recommendation. Discarding the plan entirely and abandoning the refactoring effort is incorrect because the fix is correcting the sequence, not abandoning the effort. Proceeding with generation but skipping review permanently for this phase is incorrect because permanently skipping review removes a safeguard the workflow depends on. For the exam, out-of-order execution is corrected by returning to the missed steps, not by pressing on.