A customer intends to skip building an application blueprint and start transforming code immediately. What is the main consequence of doing that?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Skip the blueprint and you'll miss dependencies the hard way. You might modernize one piece safely on its own, but something downstream can still break because you didn't know what else relied on it.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is the one saying relationships between components stay unknown, so the team risks modernizing a piece in isolation while missing dependencies that break elsewhere. Without a structural view, a team modernizing one component has no systematic way to know what else calls it or shares its data, so changes that look locally safe can have effects elsewhere in the application.
The compile-failure answer is incorrect because compilation is a property of the generated code itself and is unrelated to whether a blueprint was produced.
The no-real-consequence-if-experienced answer is incorrect because experience reduces but does not eliminate the risk of missing an undiscovered dependency in a large application.
The licensing-blocked answer is incorrect and describes no actual licensing requirement.
For the exam, tie skipping the blueprint to missed dependencies and downstream risk, not to tooling or compilation failures.