The design review agenda includes which finding would indicate the code rewrite workflow is being used correctly across a project. Which is it?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
The finding you want is a completed equivalence review on every module, no exceptions.
Full Explanation
Correct use of the workflow means pairing generation with a mandatory review that verifies the generated Java behaves the same as the original COBOL, module by module. Deploying every generated Java module directly from the workflow without additional steps is incorrect because that shortcut lets undetected defects reach production. Skipping review for modules generated from COBOL programs with no known defect history is incorrect because a clean COBOL history does not carry over automatically to a newly generated Java equivalent. Using translated comments from the original COBOL as the primary quality check is incorrect because translated comments address readability, not whether the underlying logic is correct. For the exam, universal review, not selective exemption, is the marker of a correctly run rewrite process.