When a defect is found during validation of a wca4z-generated Java…

Question

When a defect is found during validation of a wca4z-generated Java module, how should it be classified to guide remediation?

Accepted Answer

By determining whether it is a generation defect in the AI output, a translation gap from a COBOL construct, or a test data issue, so the correct remediation path is chosen — Think of it like hands-on mainframe work: when you find a defect in a wca4z-generated Java module, classify it by root cause. If it's an AI generation flaw, regenerate with better context; if it's a translation gap, code the Java piece manually; if it's test data, fix the test setup. That's how you pick the right remediation path.

Answer

As a COBOL source defect because the original program must always be the reference implementation

Answer

All defects in the Java module are automatically attributed to incomplete copybook definitions in ADDI

Answer

As a wca4z product defect requiring an IBM fix pack regardless of where the discrepancy originated

When a defect is found during validation of a wca4z-generated Java module, how should it be classified to guide remediation?

Short Explanation

Full Explanation