Which two statements correctly contrast composite actions and reusable workflows? (Choose two.)
Select all correct answers, then click Submit.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Composites are step bundles in your job; reusable workflows are nested workflows with their own jobs/runners. Secrets and I/O work for both with different mechanisms—not composites-only, and reusables do support inputs/outputs.
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
Choose composite actions when you want reusable step sequences that share the caller job’s workspace, network, and runner. Choose reusable workflows when you need separate jobs, matrices, environment approval gates, or different runs-on labels. Both can be versioned and shared across repos (with appropriate access). Composite actions are not a unique secret transport; secrets remain workflow/job constructs, and reusable workflows support secrets: and outputs. Reusable workflows explicitly support inputs and outputs at the workflow_call interface. Platform teams often expose a reusable workflow for CI policy and composites for language setup micro-steps.