An annual AI governance report to council tracks incidents, bias findings, and training completion across departments. What accountability practice is illustrated?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A yearly report to council on incidents, bias findings, and who finished training keeps AI programs honest. You'll see staff-skills reporting for what staff can do, contracted-services reporting for vendors, and deployed-outputs reporting for systems, but you've got the enterprise program report to council here. Sunshine is part of municipal governance.
Full Explanation
An annual AI governance report to council tracking incidents, bias findings, and training completion across departments illustrates ongoing governance reporting for accountability of municipal AI programs. The correct answer is ongoing governance reporting for accountability of municipal AI programs. Council oversight needs periodic, comparable metrics—not one-time launch applause. Reporting incidents, bias findings, and training completion makes risk visible, drives remediation funding, and signals that AI is managed as an enterprise program rather than a collection of unsupervised pilots.
Ongoing governance reporting for accountability of municipal AI staff skills reports on staff capability and training status and does not constitute the annual, council-facing accountability reporting on incidents, bias findings, and training completion for the enterprise program described in the question. Ongoing governance reporting for accountability of contracted AI services focuses on reporting for contracted services rather than the enterprise-wide governance reporting to council illustrated by the scenario. Ongoing governance reporting for accountability of deployed AI system outputs addresses reporting on deployed system outputs, not the council oversight reporting on incidents, bias findings, and training completion for the municipal program that the question describes.
Exam caveat: annual reporting cadence is a common pattern, not a universal legal minimum. The tested practice is ongoing accountability reporting to governing bodies; high-risk systems may need more frequent updates without abandoning the annual enterprise rollup.
Operational check: define report fields (inventory counts, incidents, bias assessments, training completion, exceptions), assign a coordinator to collect department inputs, brief council on material risks and mitigations, publish an appropriate public summary, and track corrective actions to closure before the next cycle.
Prefer to study offline? Printable PDF study book + test engine ($7.50, unofficial). These questions stay free here.