A paper-mill trip system has a conventional pressure interlock beside a new acoustic “web-break” model. The assessor lists five extra AI headaches: fuzzy goals in the sound archive, non-repeatable calls, a model that keeps learning, a decision no one can narrate, and rules that changed twice this year. What should the tester recognize?

Short Explanation

Fuzzy goals in the sound archive, non-repeatable calls, a model that keeps learning, a decision no one can narrate, and rules that changed twice this year are the syllabus's special AI-and-safety considerations. They sit beside the conventional pressure interlock. They do not replace conventional safety work on the non-AI parts.

Full Explanation

AI-based systems add specification, non-determinism, self-learning, explainability, and evolving-rule headaches. Conventional safety work on non-AI parts still applies. Replacing it, moving the bundle to Chapter 3, or inventing a vendor standard is incorrect.

×