A pier-piling tilt model has a passed slack-tide reading. Physics of the berth: a documented higher water level, other fields fixed, should not reduce predicted tilt. How should testers derive the follow-up?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Physics of the berth: a documented higher water level, other fields fixed, should not reduce predicted tilt. Derive the follow-up from that domain and physics property on the passed slack-tide reading, not from a gold tilt angle, an adversarial class flip, or a Chapter 7 canary rule.
Full Explanation
Derive a metamorphic relation and follow-up from domain knowledge, requirements, or a physical property. A gold angle for every tide, an adversarial flip, and a Chapter 7 canary rule are the wrong sources.