A mushroom-cap ID kiosk fails on a naturally scuffed cap and, separately, a researcher asks whether someone could aim such a change at the model. What distinction should the tester keep?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A naturally scuffed mushroom cap is an accidental adversarial example the model may meet in the wild. A researcher aiming such a change is malicious use. Testers look for both classes of vulnerability, still with no how-to. Treating only one class as in-scope, or renaming both as data drift, misses that distinction.
Full Explanation
Testers distinguish accidental adversarial examples from malicious use and look for both classes of vulnerability. Treating only one class as in-scope, or renaming both as data drift, misses that distinction.