After a change window, the housing authority needs continuous proof that resident-portal MFA still completes successfully. Which testing approach best provides that assurance?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Synthetic logins are like a robot resident that tries the MFA door after every change. If the bot fails, you know before real people do. Waiting for complaints, turning MFA off, or annual paper promises are weaker checks.
Full Explanation
Synthetic transactions and benchmarks continuously verify that critical user journeys—including MFA—still function after changes. They detect breakage without depending on end-user reports, disabling the control, or annual attestations. For a resident portal, automated MFA path checks are an appropriate security-assessment technique for availability and control effectiveness.