During a design review, an architect asks which choice best matches the IBM guidance. For IBM Certified watsonx Governance Lifecycle Advisor, the topic is retirement and archive. What should the team do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Retirement is like storing old tax returns—you don't shred them, you archive them safely! When an AI model or asset reaches end of life, retire or archive it but keep all the evidence. That record proves you governed responsibly, and auditors will love you for it. Clean process, all documented!
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
The correct answer is D. Retiring or archiving AI assets while preserving required evidence is essential for regulatory compliance and organizational memory. Option A is dangerous; deleting all evidence after retirement destroys the audit trail and violates most compliance frameworks. Option B is wrong because leaving retired models active creates confusion and risk—you can't monitor or support dead assets. Option C is clearly incorrect; reusing old approvals for unrelated use cases breaks governance logic and exposes new risks. IBM watsonx.governance requires intentional lifecycle closure that maintains evidence, demonstrating that you followed the full lifecycle and didn't just abandon assets.