A senior engineer reviews the current plan and notices that one key control is missing. Which approach best demonstrates approval workflow in a IBM Certified watsonx Governance Lifecycle Advisor environment?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Email threads disappear into inbox black holes, and self-approvals are the opposite of governance! Option B is your answer: structured workflows ensure you're reviewing risk and controls at each milestone, with proper sign-offs documented. Think of it like a flight checklist—pilots don't skip steps because the weather looks good, and neither should your AI approvals!
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
The correct answer is B. Structured approval workflows define review gates at key lifecycle stages (intake, development, validation, deployment, monitoring), assign reviewers with appropriate expertise, and collect documented sign-offs. This ensures systematic risk assessment and control validation. Option A (email threads) leaves no audit trail and relies on memory. Option C (self-approval for high-risk) is a conflict of interest and regulatory red flag. Option D (skipping review for high accuracy) ignores non-accuracy risks like bias, fairness, regulatory compliance, or data privacy.