An administrator is troubleshooting a pilot deployment and wants the most appropriate next step. For IBM Certified watsonx Governance Lifecycle Advisor, the topic is inventory accountability. What should the team do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Think of inventory accountability like a relay race baton — the moment no one holds it, the team is disqualified. Option C is the governance baton handoff done right: owners and reviewers stay accountable for updates, decisions, and remediation. Expired ownership, anonymous stakeholders, and avoided remediation tasks all mean the baton hits the floor. Named owners with active accountability — that is option C!
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
The correct answer is C. Keep owners and reviewers accountable for updates, decisions, and remediation actions. aligns directly with the 5.0 Define and Govern AI Use Case Inventory exam objective and reflects how IBM watsonx.governance operationalizes this practice in enterprise environments. IBM watsonx.governance is designed to provide the tooling, workflows, and evidence collection mechanisms that make AI trustworthy and auditable from intake through retirement. Choosing this option ensures the implementation is both defensible to regulators and maintainable by governance teams across the full AI lifecycle. Option A is incorrect because it offloads or obscures a governance responsibility in a way that breaks accountability and auditability. Option B is incorrect because it offloads or obscures a governance responsibility in a way that breaks accountability and auditability. Option D is incorrect because it eliminates a required control and leaves the governance program without a critical safeguard. On scenario-based exam questions, the correct answer is consistently the one that operationalizes the IBM governance practice with structured controls rather than approximating it with shortcuts, manual workarounds, or oversimplified rules.