An administrator is troubleshooting a pilot deployment and wants the most appropriate next step. The team is focused on factsheets and evidence. Which recommendation is most appropriate?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation and Infographic
Think of factsheets like a home inspection report: skip it during purchase and you will find surprises after you move in. Option C is the correct move because IBM watsonx.governance uses factsheets and evidence records to document model purpose, data lineage, evaluations, and decisions. Slide decks expire, documenting only the name tells you nothing, and avoiding factsheets for generative AI is exactly where risk hides. Factsheets are your audit-ready paper trail — option C!
Full explanation below image
Full Explanation
The correct answer is C. Use factsheets and evidence records to document model purpose, data, evaluations, and decisions. aligns directly with the 2.0 AI Lifecycle Governance exam objective and reflects how IBM watsonx.governance operationalizes this practice in enterprise environments. IBM watsonx.governance is designed to provide the tooling, workflows, and evidence collection mechanisms that make AI trustworthy and auditable from intake through retirement. Choosing this option ensures the implementation is both defensible to regulators and maintainable by governance teams across the full AI lifecycle. Option A is incorrect because it relies on an informal, non-auditable mechanism that cannot support enterprise governance at scale. Option B is incorrect because it narrows the scope to a single artifact or metric and misses the full governance requirement. Option D is incorrect because it eliminates a required control and leaves the governance program without a critical safeguard. On scenario-based exam questions, the correct answer is consistently the one that operationalizes the IBM governance practice with structured controls rather than approximating it with shortcuts, manual workarounds, or oversimplified rules.